Re: CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Tue, Jan 5, 2021, 5:03 PM Jamie Burchell <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >  Probably.  For a lot of users, Stream is a drop-in replacement that's
> better than CentOS was
>
> We will need to (manually) migrate to Stream 9.x after 5 years instead of
> 10 though?
>
>

Well that's the part that hasn't fully been laid out, stream to me just
becomes  like another disto lts release, at least with Debian flavors I
feel confident in the upgrade path but the 10 year cycle is what makes RHEL
nice.  Stream is not an option for me, I will move to Springdale or Rocky
if it matures. For what I need Springdale has been around long enough that
I know they will continue and it also looks like Fermilab may be doing
something also maybe they will get behind one of the  new entries.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]


  Powered by Linux