Re: CentOS 8 future

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 11:29 AM Johnny Hughes <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> People who certify things, who certified CentOS Linux for things, are
> free to evaluate and do that with CentOS Stream as well.

This is what makes me think this isn't as bad as people made it out to
be.  (And yeah, I take full responsibility for being one of those
'people' LOL).  For the community, there are two challenges.  One is
very easy to overcome and the other is an unknown.  (Or perhaps it is
a known, once we can get everyone to see from the same perspective.)

Suppose it is June of 2022 and I have been collecting and archiving
all of the various versions of packages that are coming out for CentOS
Stream.  Then, maybe RHEL 8.7 is finalized and hits the mirrors.  I
can analyze the versions of packages that landed in RHEL 8.7.  Then I
can grab those versions from my archive and tag them "8.7".  I could
configure my repositories appropriately and build some ISO images.  Of
course, I couldn't call that "CentOS 8.7" because RedHat has
prohibited that.  But still I could release ISO's of "Enterprise
Respin 8.7".  That is the easy problem to overcome.

But there's still the question of long term support.  Suppose it is
2027 and some major bug is found in OpenSSL.  For RedHat customers,
RedHat will build a package of OpenSSL for RHEL 8.10 that fixes the
bug.  I would guess that such an OpenSSL package would NOT be the same
one that lands in whatever version of RHEL 9 drops in 2027, since the
OpenSSL in RHEL 9 will be based on a later version of OpenSSL and have
more features.  Presumably that RHEL 8 version of OpenSSL would go
through the CentOS Streams process.  Theoretically I could pick up
that version of the package and provide it as an update to "Enterprise
Respin 8.10".

Except... how could that RHEL8 version of OpenSSL go through the
CentOS Streams process?  Based on what we've been told, at that time,
"CentOS Streams" would really be "Whatever version of RHEL 9 drops in
2027 + 1".  Or maybe it's even RHEL 10 by that point.  So maybe long
term updates won't go through the CentOS Streams process.

So the question for the community is how to account for that second issue.

--JK
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]


  Powered by Linux