On 12/15/20 11:07 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:24:03AM -0600, Tom Bishop wrote:
I know you and other RHEL folks keep saying this about cashing out etc, but
they could have kept stream and Centos stable at the same time but chose
not to. Ya know, if it walks like a duck and quacks as a duck...who knows
maybe this goes down as one of the best decisions ever for RH but I think
its going to hurt them in more ways then they ever thought about.
As I've also said before, I have no special insight into how RH and the
CentOS board came to this timeline, but I _am_ inclined to believe that the
motivation is the one that they give: they want to focus attention and
resources.
yup, I think you are right, they'll pay attention and focus on resources
...
Look at CloudLinux saying that they plan to invest a million
dollars a year
WOW!!!! a million a year, that is amazing, that will definitely get
things going, with that kind of money you can hire 3 HS students and
two college drop outs, that's
how MS started too.
into doing their rebuild. It's easy to _say_ "Red Hat could
easily have done both".
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
