Re: Blog article: CentOS is NOT dead

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



"Nicolas Kovacs" <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  https://freedomben.medium.com/centos-is-not-dead-please-stop-saying-it-is-at-least-until-you-read-this-4b26b5c44877

The article states that CentOS will now be "upstream" of RHEL instead
of "downstream".

This is strange to me. I never thought CentOS was upstream or
downstream of RHEL; I always thought it *was* RHEL -- perhaps a little
delayed, but that's not the same as being "downstream".

It's also clear that Red Hat didn't understand the importance of the
10-year support period.

-- 
Yves Bellefeuille
<yan@xxxxxxxx>




_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]


  Powered by Linux