On 14.12.2020 21:41, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 14/12/2020 à 15:25, James Pearson a écrit :
>> As others have said, it misses the _really_ important bit about the
>> traditional CentOS model which is to follow the RHEL ~10 year life cycle
>
> I totally agree with you.
>
> But when you disagree with someone (e.g. the CentOS team), it's good at
least
> to hear the person out.
>
> Back at the university here in Montpellier, we had a funny exercise in one
of
> the courses. Every one of us had to pick a subject where he or she had a
strong
> position. I remember I chose nuclear energy, which I think is a bad
choice. And
> in the exercise, I had to *defend* nuclear energy against its opponents.
>
> And I published the link to the article because it's a fine text and
nicely
> argumented.
Well, it's mostly emotional (the leitmotif: "how can you say CentOS
Stream is bad if you didn't try it?"). And the author's bio spoils the
fun, as well:
"Ben Porter is a Linux and open source advocate, currently working as an
OpenShift consultant for Red Hat."
And the comments to the graphs, where RHEL, CentOS and Fedora are placed
on a line, are simply ridiculous (such as "did you use to consider RHEL
to be the CentOS beta?"). With all due respect to Ben Porter, it didn't
convince me.
--
Sincerely,
Konstantin Boyandin
system administrator (ProWide Labs Ltd. - IPHost Network Monitor)
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
