On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 17:39 -0400, William Warren wrote:
>
> Steve Huff wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 7, 2006, at 8:54 AM, Chris Peikert wrote:
> >
> >> While downloading almost all the guilds I came across a SELINUX Guide.
> >> Whats that for?
> > dude. seriously.
> >
> > http://www.google.com/search?q=selinux
> >
> > i'm not trying to be mean to you, but: when you have a question, your
> > <snip>
> >
> > -steve
>
> it's replies like this that give Linux the bad, haughty name it has in
> the non-technical community. The following responses warning against
> asking question lest you get ignored defeat the community approach Linux
> should have.
William,
You are catching the end of a long set of threads wherein a lot of help
was offered along with good pointers to docs that would help the OP.
AFAICT, he took no advantage and managed to garner a great deal of
antipathy.
Steve's answer was completely appropriate and mild, IMO. If you have any
doubts, search for the OP's name in the archives.
--
Bill
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060407/584d9c92/attachment.bin
