Am I the only one to perceive CentOS/RedHat team members responses as quite arrogant?
> Am 08.12.2020 um 18:11 schrieb Johnny Hughes <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On 12/8/20 11:02 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:59 AM Rich Bowen <rbowen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/8/20 11:29 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>>>> I see a lot of promises that Stream will have better engagement with
>>>> the community. Why would we trust these promises?
>>>
>>> "Better engagement with the community" of course requires that the
>>> community step up and engage. Trust isn't something anyone expects to
>>> just magically happen.
>>>
>>>
>> The whole point of CentOS was so that we didn't have to "engage." We don't
>> have time for that.
>>
>> We just want a stable re-compile of RHEL, as promised. CentOS has been
>> diverging from this for a while (note the change in version names/numbers)
>> and we DON'T WANT THAT!
>
> Right, you want free RHEL .. so get in touch with Red Hat and see if you
> qualify for it.
>
> Here is how you can convert:
>
> https://access.redhat.com/articles/2360841
>
> Or, you can see if Stream can meet your requirements of something you
> can just get for free.
>
> Or, you can do something else. It is all up to you.
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
