On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 20:55 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 05:54 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 21:43 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 22:01 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 19:51 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 21:36 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 19:19 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I can try building the mysql-4.1 and the mysqlclient10 on CentOS-3.6 if
> > > > > > > > > > you have any issues (is this i386 or x86_64 or both).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Let us know if it works for you ... maybe we will build it for
> > > > > > > > > > CentOSPlus for C3.
> > > > > > > > > ----
> > > > > > > > > This is i386 that I am referring to. I was going to build it tonight. If
> > > > > > > > > you want to build it, I will use it and report back, otherwise, I don't
> > > > > > > > > expect too much issue with building it from SRPM
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The CentOS-4.3 SRPM won't build as written as there is a require (in the
> > > > > > > > configure.in file) for an autoconf that is newer than the one in
> > > > > > > > CentOS-3.6.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I patched the SRPM to use autoconf 2.57 (which is the version in
> > > > > > > > CentOS-3.6) ... it seems to be building now.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'll let you know if it builds properly.
> > > > > > > ----
> > > > > > > did we reach fruition?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nope :(
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My only centos-3 build machine is in a chroot and it fails the tcp
> > > > > > connect check for mysql.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can d/l the SRPM here and build it on a C3 machine though, it should
> > > > > > work if done outside a chroot:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://centos.hughesjr.com/testing/SRPMS/
> > > > > ----
> > > > > where's my manners?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you Johnny
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > you're welcome :)
> > > >
> > > > The mysqlclient is building now, it doesn't seem to need any mods to the
> > > > SRPM ... I think it will fail a similar check though as the MYSQL
> > > > running on localhost on my buildmachine (outside the chroot) is on
> > > > centos4.
> > > ----
> > > FWIW, it built without errors while I was out to dinner - I am waiting
> > > on the client if you get that built.
> > >
> > OK ... the mysqlclient RPMS are available here ... the SRPM did not
> > require changes, so the original one in CentOS-4.3 is applicable:
> >
> > http://centos.hughesjr.com/testing/RPMS/mysqlclient10/
> ----
> Early report - WOW - thanks
>
> Using the mysql-4.1.12-3, mysql-server, mysql-devel built from the SRPMS
> that you created and client above...
>
> rpm -Uvh those packages all at once and they completely replaced the
> equiv 3.23.58-x packages and mysql started right up and apparently the
> mysqldump that I did wasn't even necessary (holding on to it as a just
> in case).
>
> my horde setup connected immediately (php-mysql is apparently happy) and
> life seems to be really, really good.
>
> Thanks for the help. I can give you the binary RPM's that I created from
> your SRPMS (and the build logs) if you wish but I do have to
> confess...this is one of the few machines that I set up with Whitebox
> and haven't migrated over (in fact, John has been pretty good lately
> about releasing updates though the yum updates still are slow)...I'm
> thinking that I will maybe get 6 months to a year more from this box
> before I have to do something in a major type of upgrade.
>
> Anyway - thanks for the help, it really seems to have worked
> wonderfully. I would suppose that if upstream releases a new SRPM (and
> likewise CentOS), then the spec file that I have now should be able to
> build it?
Yes ... if you add the last patch listed in the modified SPEC file to
the new spec file from the new SRPM, you should be able to build it.
The mysqlclient built and worked as is.
Glad it worked for you.
We'll get our C3 guys to build it if they want to put it in C3
CentOSPlus.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060407/4fd246ae/attachment.bin
