Re: Blog article about the state of CentOS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 6/17/20 10:19 AM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
...
I wonder about the authors conclusion; the fact that RHEL is the choice
for critical applications (what ever critical is) is known since the early days. This applies randomly to C5.11, C4.9 or C8.2.2004.

So - cold soup get cooked again :-)


Indeed.  The author's conclusion has been the case since White Box Enterprise Linux was a thing.  Anyone and everyone can get the sources from git.centos.org as soon as they are released and build the stuff themselves if they think it can be done faster; that's how WBEL got started, as a one-user project that just happened to be publicly released.  Building from source has never really been any easier; the lack of .src.rpms is not an impediment to just getting something built.  But the CentOS value-add is that those rebuilt sources have been tested for binary compatibility and are from a trusted source.  A one-person project like WBEL would have a much more difficult time today, with modularity especially. Build times for these packages is not zero.



_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]


  Powered by Linux