Re: ip6tables equivalent for NAT?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter <shiva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> I figure that TCP is easy: Add a rule to the forward chain to allow
> SYN packets. There's already connection tracking to handle
> established connections. Does connection tracking handle UDP? If I
> allow all UDP from the LAN interface and one sends a DNS query from
> LAN to WAN, will the reply get back? I don't want to blanket
> authorize all UDP. ICMPv6, maybe, to allow traceroutes. Unless
> that's also handled by the tracking system.

Anything that's already working through IPv4 NAT should work just fine
through IPv6 with connection tracking.

IPv4 NAT is a stateful, connection tracking, packet mangling firewall.
With IPv6, you can just do the same thing without the packet mangling
misfeatures of NAT, with just connection tracking.

But don't go blocking ICMP - doing that in IPv4 already can break
things, and it can break even more things in IPv6.

-- 
Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]


  Powered by Linux