Re: Building a NFS server with a mix of HDD and SSD (for caching)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 24/03/2020 17:37, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
Hi,

Hi list,

I'm building a NFS server on top of CentOS 8.
It has 8 x 8 TB HDDs and 2 x 500GB SSDs.
The spinning drives are in a RAID-6 array. They are 4K sector size.
The SSDs are in RAID-1 array and with a 512bytes sector size.


I want to use the SSDs as a cache using dm-cache. So here what I've done
so far:
/dev/sdb ==> SSD raid1 array
/dev/sdd ==> spinning raid6 array
Looks like you're using a hardware raid controller, right?

Yes it's a "PERC H740P Mini" with 8GB of cache.


I've added "allow_mixed_block_sizes = 1" to lvm.conf to be able to add
sdb and sdd in the same VG (because of the sector size missmatch). But
as the LVs will only use one and only one PV I guess it's OK.

# lvcreate -L 500M -n lv_cache_meta VGnfs /dev/sdb
# lvcreate -l +100%FREE -n lv_cache VGnfs /dev/sdb
# lvconvert --type cache-pool /dev/VGnfs/lv_cache --poolmetadata
/dev/VGnfs/lv_cache_meta
# lvcreate -l +100%FREE -n LVnfs VGnfs /dev/sdd
# lvconvert --type cache /dev/VGnfs/LVnfs --cachepool /dev/VGnfs/lv_cache
# lvconvert --cachemode writeback --type cache /dev/VGnfs/LVnfs
--cachepool /dev/VGnfs/lv_cache
# mkfs.xfs /dev/VGnfs/LVnfs

And now I'm asking myself if I'm not doing something somewhat dangerous
for a server that will be critical when in production :]
I can't comment here as I've never used SSD as a cache the way you do it.

The server has 128GB of RAM so maybe the caching in memory will be
sufficient to achieve good performance ?
The 128GB will of course help as read cache but what about write cache? If
your raid hardware has battery/flash based write cache and is big enough,
then you could set it in write back mode and make use of it.

Yes it has, the current mode is write back until the battery condition is problematic.

  I'm not sure
your proposed configuration is safe enough.

Yes, I'm thinking about abandoning it, especially since I'm achieving acceptable performance without another layer of cache.
I was just wondering if other people were using it in production.

Thanks anyway, take care
kfx


Regards,
Simon

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]


  Powered by Linux