On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 12:04 -0700, Bogdan Nicolescu wrote:
> What is hard to understand is if I take the same EXACT
> kernel Centos take, which I assume is available, and I
> compile everything Centos compiles in, except I
> compile some hardware in the kernel rather than
> modularize it (as Centos does), how exactly is that
> going to break functionality? How exactly is removing
> ext2 (if it is included in Centos default compilation)
> from the kernel is going to break Centos if I don't
> ever use ext2?
>
I told you where to get the kernels and how to compile it in a different
post ...
Look in the SRPMS directory in the os or update trees for the latest
update set, or in http://vault.centos.org/ for older versions.
Every kernel we have released has it's SRPM there.
I also pointed you to the release notes ... search for "kernel source":
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/docs/html/release-notes/as-x86/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060402/04f42be6/attachment.bin
