On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 7:04 AM Eddie O'Connor <eoconnor25@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Wouldn't a "find grub / find grub*"....or "locate grub / locate grub*"
> work?...
>
locate would require to install that package and run updatedb
first. But, it would save time looking for files that have been
already added to its db, specially compared to running find in a large
system.
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2019, 6:57 AM Peter <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On 27/12/19 7:36 pm, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> > > Le 27/12/2019 à 04:11, Mauricio Tavares a écrit :
> > >> Why is it not there? FYI, I did try 'yum reinstall grub2' and no
> > >> /boot/grub2/grub.cfg for me.
> > >
> > > You're probably on an EFI system, and your grub.cfg is in a different
> > > location. Can't remember it off the top of my head, but do
> >
> > /etc/grub2-efi.cfg -> ../boot/efi/EFI/centos/grub.cfg
> >
Right you are. I have to say sometimes I wonder if running EFI
in this system (200GB boot drive I am using 10G of it) makes sense.
With that said, if that is the case, why would the alias
/etc/grub2.cfg still be created if it points to a non-existing file?
Wouldn't it make sense for it to just either not to be there at all or
point to the efi one? I can make arguments for both sides, but not for
a homeless alias.
On a side note, would it be a case where both
/boot/efi/EFI/centos/grub.cfg and /boot/grub2/grub.cfg are installed?
> >
> > Peter
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
