_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: ls permissions format changed in CentOS 8
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: ls permissions format changed in CentOS 8
- From: Kenneth Porter <shiva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 17:13:44 -0700
- In-reply-to: <2c15ca93-63f8-a95d-5194-eec73110ee00@uni-x.org>
- References: <4F5E61BAD29512886FB6291C@[172.27.17.193]> <2c15ca93-63f8-a95d-5194-eec73110ee00@uni-x.org>
Found it. It happens from the process buffer inside Lugaru Epsilon. I think
ls thinks it's doing a DIRED output instead of a shell output. Now I need
to figure out why it thinks that. This wasn't happening in CentOS 7.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ls permissions format changed in CentOS 8
- From: Kenneth Porter
- Re: ls permissions format changed in CentOS 8
- References:
- ls permissions format changed in CentOS 8
- From: Kenneth Porter
- Re: ls permissions format changed in CentOS 8
- From: Alexander Dalloz
- ls permissions format changed in CentOS 8
- Prev by Date: Re: ls permissions format changed in CentOS 8
- Next by Date: Re: ls permissions format changed in CentOS 8
- Previous by thread: Re: ls permissions format changed in CentOS 8
- Next by thread: Re: ls permissions format changed in CentOS 8
- Index(es):
 |