On 10/15/19 9:16 PM, Nathan Coulson wrote:
> On 2019-10-15 12:12 p.m., Nathan Coulson wrote:
>> I was working on a haproxy transparent proxy setup that we had working
>> on Centos 7 (iptables), but running into issues getting tproxy working
>> with NFTables on Centos 8.
>>
>> From https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/tproxy.txt,
>>
>> It should be a matter of:
>>
>> # nft add table filter
>> # nft add chain filter divert "{ type filter hook prerouting priority
>> -150; }"
>> # nft add rule filter divert meta l4proto tcp socket transparent 1
>> meta mark set 1 accept
>>
>> But when running the 3rd line (add rule), I get
>>
>> root@kryptonite [/lib/modules/4.18.0-80.11.2.el8_0.x86_64]# nft add
>> rule filter divert meta l4proto tcp socket transparent 1 meta mark set
>> 1 accept
>> Error: Could not process rule: No such file or directory
>> add rule filter divert meta l4proto tcp socket transparent 1 meta mark
>> set 1 accept
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>>
>> (In attempting to resolve this, I did the following)
>>
>> modprobe nf_tproxy_ipv4
>> modprobe nf_tproxy_ipv6
>> modprobe nf_socket_ipv4
>> modprobe nf_socket_ipv6
>>
>> I also noted that:
>> nft add rule filter divert meta l4proto tcp meta mark set 1 accept
>> (Removing socket transparent 1)
>>
>> does not exit with a failure.
>>
>> Also found https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651813, (which
>> did make reference to the nftables version 0.9.0 possibly missing
>> support, I have not tried compiling 0.9.1 yet, but I find it curious
>> the entire line fails with 'socket transparent 1' making me wonder if
>> it is a missing module still)
>>
>>
> Adding to this: just did a loop through the netfilter modules to see if
> something was missing (no change)
>
> for x in $(find /lib/modules/4.18.0-80.11.2.el8_0.x86_64 | grep
> netfilter | sed 's/.*netfilter.//' | sed 's/\.ko.*$//' | sort); do
> echo ">>>>>>$x<<<<<<<<"
> modprobe $x
> nft add rule filter divert meta l4proto tcp socket transparent 1 meta
> mark set 1 accept
> done
>
>
How is that solved for Fedora 28 that CentOS 8 is based on?
--
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe
StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
