> I was told lately about this workaround, check it out.
> https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2019/05/04/update-regarding-add-ons-in-firefox/
The signing thing is a security feature. I don't like a workaround to
disable a security feature instead of fixing it.
What makes me feel a bit bad is that everybody has fixed versions by now,
only we enterprise Linux users using the ESR version still don't have
fixed versions available. I don't complain because we usually get very
fast updates, but this time we seem stuck. I can live with it but it's a
bit difficult to explain to our users.
Did upstream already release new packages?
Regards,
Simon
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 16:50:20
>> Subject: Firefox esr repackage
>
>> Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly
>> well know
>> extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin.
>>
>> From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates
>> repository is
>> 60.6.1-1.el7.
>> It looks like Mozilla have just released firefox esr 60.6.2 which should
>> fix the
>> signing issue.
>> (see https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/60.6.2/releasenotes/)
>>
>> Would it be possible for someone to pass this message on to someone who
>> can
>> package this, so that users like me can update?
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
