Nothing against removing drpms. Nuke them.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
----- Original Message -----
> From: "johnny" <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, 25 March, 2019 12:32:33
> Subject: Re: http error when updating 7.5 ==> 7.6
> On 3/25/19 6:37 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 3/23/19 9:19 AM, Bez Thomas wrote:
>>>> On Mar 22, 2019, at 9:52 PM, Fred Smith <fredex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Was just doing a (very) belated update on a 7.5 system and ran into
>>>> this set of errors:
>>>>
>>>
>>>> Some delta RPMs failed to download or rebuild. Retrying..
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> so, anybody know why we're getting the 416 error from yum but not from
>>>> firefox?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Fred,
>>>
>>> Ran into this yesterday. It seems to be a delta rpm problem.
>>> Firefox is working because it’s downloading the whole rpm, avoiding the issue.
>>>
>>> setting
>>> deltarpm=0
>>> in /etc/yum.conf is an equivalent workaround, and fixed the issue for me.
>>>
>>> I’d appreciate someone who knows more about how delta rpms work weighing in on
>>> what the actual issue is.
>>>
>>
>> Not sure what happened with the drpms, but I will regenerate all the
>> polkit drpms with the upcoming ghostscript release later this morning.
>>
>> I added drpm tests to our pre-release CI tests as well.
>>
>
> This is not the first time we have had issues with drpms in the update tree.
>
> Would anyone be opposed to taking away deltarpms from the repositories?
>
> They take up lots of space and they have cause multiple issues in the past.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
