miguel medalha wrote: >> No, I dislike UUIDs. I dislike, strongly, lots of extra typing that >> doesn't really get me anything. MAYBE, if you're in a Google or Amazon >> datacenter, with 500,000 physical servers (I phone interviewed with >> them 10 years ago)... but short of that? Nope. >> > You can (perhaps should...) use the World Wide Name, which is a > manufacturer ID unique to each disk. Contrary to the /sdX, it doesn't > change with different configurations, OS or computer. An example of such > an ID is the following: > > /dev/disk/by-id/wwn-0x50025ee3b4f5ca61 > > Many modern disks have their WWN printed on their labels. > Why? And if I'm partitioning it, that won't work anyway. I partition, then format with -l <labelname> and I don't *have* to change configuration, if I'm say, replacing a failed disk. The labels I use *mean* something - root, export, etc. Why would I want a meaningless id? That's like companies who name everyone's computer some id, rather than, say, mrothltp? Hell, a few hours ago, a manager came to me to ask about network issues. I thought I'd try to ping his system, and asked him the system name. Of *course* he couldn't remember it. Self-documenting ia useful, if not carried overboard. mark _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos