On Monday 28 January 2019 12:23:25 Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
> > Am 28.01.2019 um 10:50 schrieb Peter Eckel <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > I used Bacula before I switched to Bareos.
> >
> > There was a point, however, when the open source release of Bacula
> > became, to put it mildly, a bit too inactive for my taste.
>
> Inactive? Every 2 months a release (average):
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/bacula/mailman/bacula-announce/
I am a long time user of Bacula (Fedora 9) but I must admit that I do not keep
up with versions. (I'm still running the F9 Bacula 5.2 director).
What real world benefits would I get from upgrading to the current Bacula
version? What problems woudl I have? What are the arguments for/against
Bareos?
My storage servers range from F9 to C7 and all work fine.
I'm still using the old WinBacula clients even with the new Win10 boxes.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
