On 12/25/18 4:48 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 01:26:15PM -0500, rj coleman wrote:
On Dec 24, 2018, at 10:42 AM, Alice Wonder <alice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 12/24/18 7:21 AM, vsnsdualce@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Debian is not ruled by the men who actually write the software, but instead women.
*snip*
Can we please ban the person who sent that disgusting rant to the list
I was under the impression that it was sarcasm. Whenever something gets
posted a or a code of conduct that comes down to don't be a jerk is
adapted, there's lots of people who feel their right to be jerks has been
infringed. I could easily be wrong but I thought that post was making a
about why such codes of conduct become necessary.
Could be, I'm autistic and often completely miss what other people claim
was obvious sarcasm. But sometimes what I think they might claim was
obvious sarcasm based upon past experience it wasn't.
That's why /sarcasm or other indications really should be used, not all
minds work the same and it isn't fair to assume they should.
--
For signature trust anchor (paranoid only need worry 'bout this):
https://ca.pipfrosch.com/pipfrosch-cacert-pem.crt
Webmail clients, sorry, out of luck, you can't import it.
Get an actual e-mail app.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
