Re: CentOS Digest, Vol 163, Issue 10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



the thread seams to have dead out or gone from rdadmin login prassword
reset to user login on centos
I dumped mysql to find the password but can't find it
with this comand
 $mysql dump -u rduser -p Rivendell > resetpass.sql
i am useing rduser to run airplay but I can't get into config part of
rdadmin
which rdadmin controls the paramiter to set the rduser program like
rdairplay, rdlogedit, rdlibary...ect
rdadmin is used to set default and setting all threwout the rd program....
for radio...


On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 7:00 AM, <centos-request@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Send CentOS mailing list submissions to
>         centos@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         centos-request@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         centos-owner@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CentOS digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Can't boot into GUI: Centos 7 "Server with GUI" option
>       (James Pearson)
>    2. bad udp cksum (Laszlo Danielisz)
>    3. xfs quota question (mark)
>    4. Re: xfs quota question (Valeri Galtsev)
>    5. Re: xfs quota question (mark)
>    6. Re: xfs quota question (Valeri Galtsev)
>    7. Re: bad udp cksum (Simon Matter)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 12:20:26 +0000
> From: James Pearson <james-p@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Jay Hart <jhart@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re:  Can't boot into GUI: Centos 7 "Server with GUI"
>         option
> Message-ID: <a7387fc9-ddcd-f827-cf07-76667a2a0b2e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Jay Hart wrote:
> >
> > A complete step by step would be appreciated. It will avoid further
> back-n-forth.
>
> It's not that difficult - a quick google of 'centos 7 rebuild initramfs'
> brings up (e.g.)
> https://sites.google.com/site/syscookbook/rhel/rhel-kernel-rebuild
>
> James Pearson
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 14:53:17 -0400
> From: Laszlo Danielisz <lacibsd@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:  bad udp cksum
> Message-ID:
>         <CABPYxKwuSPEeNxdAUu2p4h-oTibH-RJBnxntWbVO2NuBk0-zfA@
> mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Hi,
>
> Recently I'm noticing an interesting issue.
> My CentOS servers are trying to send logs to a logging server via 514/udp,
> however I'm not receiving anything.
>
> I did the following on CentOS
> *tcpdump -vvv -nn udp -i esn160 port 514*
>
> In another session on the same server:
> *nc syslog-server -u 514*
>
> tcpdump started to show me messages like:
> *[bad udp cksum 0x3ce9 -> 0xb0f5!] SYSLOG, length: 172*
>
> After some research I disabled TCO (ethtool -K ens160 tx off rx off), now
> tcpdump shows:
> *[udp sum ok] [|syslog]*
> And I'm also receiving the logs. Yay!
>
> I have the same issue on multiple servers with CentOS versions 7.3.1611,
> 7.4.1708 & 7.5.1804. I'm having the issue no matter if it is a physical or
> virtual server (they also use different hardware and NIC's)
>
> Of course I could run ethtool every time a server starts but I think there
> should be a better solution. Also I enjoy having TCO giving some rest to
> the CPUs.
>
> Did anyone find a solution for this?
>
> Thanks!
> Laszlo
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 15:57:25 -0400
> From: "mark" <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject:  xfs quota question
> Message-ID:
>         <993f74e35fb023b2a49b9053dc3e5a3f.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
>
> Can I go to an existing xfs file system, and apply a soft quota to each
> user on it? If I do, can I then run a report, and see who's using how
> much, or does it only apply to files created after the quotas are applied?
>
>        mark
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 15:22:30 -0500
> From: Valeri Galtsev <galtsev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:  xfs quota question
> Message-ID: <6551c6c1-bbb6-ef43-eb3d-03de0fa58b8c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
>
>
> On 08/09/18 14:57, mark wrote:
> > Can I go to an existing xfs file system, and apply a soft quota to each
> > user on it? If I do, can I then run a report, and see who's using how
> > much, or does it only apply to files created after the quotas are
> applied?
> >
>
> After remounting XFS filesystem with option "usrquota" you can issue the
> command similar to:
>
> xfs_quota -x -c "limit bsoft=8g bhard=10g -d" /home
>
> This command will enable the limits above for all users (-d flag),
> except users who have their limits existing already (usually ones who
> preformed fs operations).
>
> For those who already have some limits set you can still can change
> these limits, but with individual command, say in the loop, like:
>
> for i in `cat user_list`; \
> do xfs_quota -x -c "limit bsoft=8g bhard=10g $i; \
> done
>
> I hope, this helps.
>
> Valeri
>
>
> >         mark
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
>
> --
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Valeri Galtsev
> Sr System Administrator
> Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
> Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
> University of Chicago
> Phone: 773-702-4247
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 17:24:09 -0400
> From: "mark" <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re:  xfs quota question
> Message-ID:
>         <4e5e8e726f2df226bc9d6612a1a572c1.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
>
> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> > On 08/09/18 14:57, mark wrote:
> >
> >> Can I go to an existing xfs file system, and apply a soft quota to each
> >>  user on it? If I do, can I then run a report, and see who's using how
> >> much, or does it only apply to files created after the quotas are
> >> applied?
> >
> > After remounting XFS filesystem with option "usrquota" you can issue the
> > command similar to:
> >
> > xfs_quota -x -c "limit bsoft=8g bhard=10g -d" /home
> >
> > This command will enable the limits above for all users (-d flag),
> > except users who have their limits existing already (usually ones who
> > preformed fs operations).
> >
> > For those who already have some limits set you can still can change
> > these limits, but with individual command, say in the loop, like:
> >
> > for i in `cat user_list`; \ do xfs_quota -x -c "limit bsoft=8g bhard=10g
> > $i; \
> > done
> >
> > I hope, this helps.
>
> Will that work if I do a mount -o remount?
>
>     mark
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 16:57:06 -0500 (CDT)
> From: "Valeri Galtsev" <galtsev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re:  xfs quota question
> Message-ID:
>         <54719.108.68.162.197.1533851826.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>
>
> On Thu, August 9, 2018 4:24 pm, mark wrote:
> > Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> >> On 08/09/18 14:57, mark wrote:
> >>
> >>> Can I go to an existing xfs file system, and apply a soft quota to each
> >>>  user on it? If I do, can I then run a report, and see who's using how
> >>> much, or does it only apply to files created after the quotas are
> >>> applied?
> >>
> >> After remounting XFS filesystem with option "usrquota" you can issue the
> >> command similar to:
> >>
> >> xfs_quota -x -c "limit bsoft=8g bhard=10g -d" /home
> >>
> >> This command will enable the limits above for all users (-d flag),
> >> except users who have their limits existing already (usually ones who
> >> preformed fs operations).
> >>
> >> For those who already have some limits set you can still can change
> >> these limits, but with individual command, say in the loop, like:
> >>
> >> for i in `cat user_list`; \ do xfs_quota -x -c "limit bsoft=8g bhard=10g
> >> $i; \
> >> done
> >>
> >> I hope, this helps.
> >
> > Will that work if I do a mount -o remount?
>
> If you are able to execute
>
> mount -o remount -o usrquota /mountpoint
>
> then you are OK. Normally, you will not be able to do it if there is even
> a single file open on the filesystem, Therefore if it is /home you do have
> to kick all users off. Executing any command related to quota will make it
> obvious if particular filesystem is mounted with quotas enabled or not.
>
> Good luck.
>
> Valeri
>
> >
> >     mark
>
>
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Valeri Galtsev
> Sr System Administrator
> Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics
> Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
> University of Chicago
> Phone: 773-702-4247
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 09:34:24 +0200
> From: "Simon Matter" <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re:  bad udp cksum
> Message-ID:
>         <1c988b38e34d5ddc32177f921f7a6c6b.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Recently I'm noticing an interesting issue.
> > My CentOS servers are trying to send logs to a logging server via
> 514/udp,
> > however I'm not receiving anything.
> >
> > I did the following on CentOS
> > *tcpdump -vvv -nn udp -i esn160 port 514*
> >
> > In another session on the same server:
> > *nc syslog-server -u 514*
> >
> > tcpdump started to show me messages like:
> > *[bad udp cksum 0x3ce9 -> 0xb0f5!] SYSLOG, length: 172*
> >
> > After some research I disabled TCO (ethtool -K ens160 tx off rx off), now
> > tcpdump shows:
> > *[udp sum ok] [|syslog]*
> > And I'm also receiving the logs. Yay!
> >
> > I have the same issue on multiple servers with CentOS versions 7.3.1611,
> > 7.4.1708 & 7.5.1804. I'm having the issue no matter if it is a physical
> or
> > virtual server (they also use different hardware and NIC's)
> >
> > Of course I could run ethtool every time a server starts but I think
> there
> > should be a better solution. Also I enjoy having TCO giving some rest to
> > the CPUs.
> >
> > Did anyone find a solution for this?
>
> You can configure the ETHTOOL_OPTS option in the ifcfg files to
> automatically assign settings on startup.
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of CentOS Digest, Vol 163, Issue 10
> ***************************************
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]


  Powered by Linux