Re: Which is better? Microsoft Exchange 2016 or Linux-based SMTP Servers?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



19 jul 2018 kl. 20:33 skrev Keith Keller <kkeller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> On 2018-07-19, Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> Well said. I feel that too many people today have forgotten (or, more
>> likely, never learned) these lessons from history. People give away
>> their personal and supposedly private information too easily and, I feel
>> certain, will come to regret it (some already have come to regret it).
> 
> While I agree with the above, it doesn't really address Johnny's
> question, which is which open source calendaring projects can compete
> with Google calendar for users' ease of use?  If I give my users Zimbra,
> and they hate it, then what?  For simple email use, there are plenty of
> clients which can talk IMAP/SMTP to a linux server, but the options for
> calendaring (and ''groupware'' in general) are much sparser.
> 
> It's a hard question, and each organization needs to weigh their privacy
> concerns against their users' requirements.
> 
> --keith

Just to chime in, I'm using Fruux.com for a client, and while it's not per se an open source service, it works really really well and uses open source protocols for its operation (CalDAV and CardDAV). They also have great central administration, even if it's all local accounts. They use SabreDAV as the foundation for the service, hence I think it's worth mentioning.

Regards, Leo
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]


  Powered by Linux