Re: Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 07/11/2018 01:36 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 07/11/2018 08:28 AM, Phil Wyett wrote:
>> On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 06:31 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> On 07/09/2018 09:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>> On 07/06/2018 10:30 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>>> On 07/05/2018 02:27 PM, Phil Wyett wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:16 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>> On 07/03/2018 09:04 AM, Sean wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OK guys .. Firefox 60 is going to take some time .. likely more for
>>>>>>> CentOS-6 than CentOS-7.
>>>>>>> They both (C6 and C7 versions) require many non OS tools to build.
>>>>>>> For CentOS-7 .. we need the rust-toolset, llvm-toolset, and
>>>>>>> devtoolset-7, to get the firefox to build.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My current issue building the latest firefox is the required rust
>>>>>> version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the [sclo-rh] section of the epel-7 mock config I change line:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> includepkgs=devtoolset*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>
>>>>>> includepkgs=devtoolset* llvm-toolset* rust-toolset*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Current rust is 1.20 and configure will stop asking for 1.24.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> indeed .. that is one issue.  I am working on it .. we also have to do
>>>>> i386 as that is released in the base OS .. so I have to get a working
>>>>> devtoolset-7 for i386, ppc64, ppc as well .. and the latest rust and the
>>>>> latest llvm .. for i386, x86_64, ppc64le, ppc64, ppc, aarch64, armhfp
>>>>> .. that is for C&
>>>>>
>>>>> I would just do x86_64 and i386 first, then the rest .. BUT .. since I
>>>>> have to bootstrap the devtoolket and llvm and rust on c7 for i386 anyway
>>>>> .. also doig ti for the other arches does nto really add any more time
>>>>> as the compiles are in parallel on different machines.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hopefully for C7 I will have updates by Monday
>>>>>
>>>>> For C6 .. I am going to need to rework rust, etc. .. that will take
>>>>> longer  .. rust requires python27 not python26 .. so lots of patches are
>>>>> going to be req'd for that.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is a status update ..
>>>>
>>>> I now have the c7-devtoolkit-7 built for all arches (i386, x86_64,
>>>> armhfp, aarch64, ppc64le, ppc64, ppc).
>>>>
>>>> I now have the c6-devtoolkit-7 built for all arches (i386. x86_64).
>>>>
>>>> I am in the process of building the latest llvm-toolkit and the
>>>> rust-toolkit for CentOS 7 on all arches.  (Both needed for firefox-60 on c7)
>>>>
>>>> I am in the process of figuring out all the changes needed to build the
>>>> rust-toolkit for CentOS-6 as there is no released source code with the
>>>> proper patches yet .. and it needs to be modified to build with the
>>>> python used in EL6.
>>>>
>>>> So, hopefully very soon we will have all the required kits to build
>>>> firefox for CentOS-7 .. CentOS-6 may be a bit longer.
>>>>
>>
>>> Status currently is that I have a version built for CentOS-7 x86_64.
>>
>>> I am currently still building the require toolsets for i386 as
>>> firefox.i686 is released as a multilib package in the x86_64 repo.
>>
>>> So, I can't release the x86_64 package without the i686 one.
>>
>>> You can download the x86_64 package manually if you don't want to wait
>>> .. but I should have them both (i686 and x86_64) for CentOS-7 later today.
>>
>>
>> The release of firefox will also include release of the scl toolsets for
>> developers who modify and build for own needs?
> 
> The SCL SIG releases SCLs and devtool sets // they are not part of the
> OS, so no signed pieces will be released.
> 
> I could put them on buildlogs for the el7 ones if there is interest.
> 
> 


CentOS-7 x86_64 and i686 firefox packages are now signed and pushed to
the master server.  They should be available on mirror.centos.org within
an hour.

Expect the CentOS-6 firefox packages tomorrow before.

And the other Centos-7 altarch packages (ppc64, ppc64le, aarch64,
armhfp) on Friday.  There is no longer a ppc (32) firefox package as
some of the tool kits do not build in ppc (32) .. that is also the case
in RHEL (no longer a ppc firefox).

There is a possibility that the armhfp version could take longer than
the other CentOS-7 AltAtch versions .. still workignon some technical
issues on the rust-toolset for armhfp.

Thanks,
Johnny Hughes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]


  Powered by Linux