Why, good evening, Bob!!! On Sunday 18 September 2005 4:51 pm, Robert Hanson wrote: > Dave, > > Although I have had decent to good success with 3.x to 4.x upgrades myself, > I do not recommend it in most circumstances.... and recommend backup of > configs and data and then fresh install and reconfig and restore data etc > > Kind regards, I just wanted to make certain it would even *work*, and it did. This winter I would really *like* to avoid long trips to Republic's mines, and if I can make this work remotely, it will save me some time spent sweating on those icy lonesome roads. FWIW, I was able to do two different kinds of upgrades this afternoon, one remotely (across the room on a different network) and one using 4.1 CD's and an existing 3.3 CentOS box. However, it was good hearing from you. How is everything? Dave -- Dave Laird (Dave@xxxxxxxxxx) The Used Kharma Lot / The Phoenix Project An automatic & random fortune for the Minute: Paranoids are people, too; they have their own problems. It's easy to criticize, but if everybody hated you, you'd be paranoid too. -- D.J. Hicks -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050918/36a97ce6/attachment.bin