Re: An rpmbuild spec question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 12/27/17 18:36, Kenneth Porter wrote:
On 12/27/2017 3:09 PM, m.roth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
My current issue, that I keep falling back to, is the install
*INSISTS*  that it has to add a - after version.

You're missing the spec file header that includes lots of meta information. The dash is to separate the version from the package release string. You should have a Release: header to fill that in.

I understood that... but I don't *want* a release number. Unless you're suggesting that I *must* do something like change my package name and directory to 1.27-0.

	mark

  install -m 744 -d %{buildroot}/%{name}-%{version}
No need to set the mode here. Do that in the %files section with the defattrs tag.
%files
%{buildroot}/%{name}
Use the final absolute install path in %files. Don't include the buildroot. So just /opt/%{name}.
What I see from the rpmbuild is
+ cd /usr//local//src//rpmbuild/BUILD
Don't build as root. I create a special user to build packages from. Install the rpmdevtools package and run rpmdev-setuptree as your build user.

http://www.g-loaded.eu/2006/04/05/how-to-build-rpm-packages-on-fedora/
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]


  Powered by Linux