On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 14 September 2017 at 11:54, Larry Martell <larry.martell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Rich Huff <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 11:25 -0400, Larry Martell wrote: >>>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Darr247 <darr247@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > > I have some software that says it requires JRE 8.1 or higher. >>>> > >>>> > That's very odd, since technically JRE 8 is java 1.8 (and JRE 7 >>>> > is/was 1.7; >>>> > JRE 6 was 1.6, et cetera). >>>> > >>>> > > If I go to >>>> > >>>> > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jre8-downlo >>>> > ads-21331 >>>> > 55.html >>>> > > and install jre-8u144-linux-x64.rpm I get jrel.8.0_144. Anyone >>>> > > know where >>>> > >>>> > I can get 8.1? >>>> > >>>> > http://javadl.oracle.com/webapps/download/AutoDL?BundleId=225344_09 >>>> > 0f390dda5 >>>> > b47b9b721c7dfaa008135 >>>> > should get you the 64-bit v1.8 build 144 of Java, which is indeed >>>> > the latest >>>> > version. >>>> > >>>> > What software is it that requires JRE 8.1? >>>> >>>> Sorry I mistyped it says 1.8 or greater. I did install that and I >>>> still get the message. It's remote control software for an IBM >>>> system. >>> >>> Do you have a lower version Java installed? >>> What does command 'java -version' say? >> >> openJDK version "1.8.0_101" >> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_101-b13) >> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.101-b13, mixed mode) >> >> >>> IBM has their own flavor of Java. Is it looking for that? >> >> I don't know. I am running CentOS6 and then trying to run their remote >> control SW throught FF. Maybe I have to restart FF ... going to try >> that ... no joy, same errors. Contacting IBM now. > > For some of the IBM hardware I have had to use a new Java but an old > copy of Firefox. The best explanation I have is probably flawed but it > was that the hardware wanted SSL1/SSL2 type stuff which the new > Firefox and items blocked. There is probably a better way to fix it. I have FF version 24.6.0 - probably very old. This is a locked down machine, not on the internet, so installing anything is a pain. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos