Also, Upi, people need more than work, they need work patterns.
Making arch releases in a particular order is safer than an
'as available' order in many cases.
So the particular order is 'i386 first'.
If you were a (co)developer/tester/maintainer/distributor, your
work pattern would be significant.
So: Help row the boat, or (happily) enjoy the scenery.
Brian Brunner
brian.t.brunner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(610)796-5838
>>> Jay.Hilliard@xxxxxxxxxx 09/15/05 01:47AM >>>
Pasi Pirhonen wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 05:52:15PM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>>We usually release our first arch (i386) with a week of the upstream
>>release and our other arches within a week after the first arch release.
>>
>
>
> I find it a bit offensive when it's brough out as it is above.
> It really should be 'we have a policy of releasing i386 first
> even when anything else would be ready before'.
>
Well, I appreciate the efforts of Johnny H. and if it takes a week or two,
regardless of ARCH, so be it. He's doing a lot. What happens if he needs an
extended vacation? He *is* CentOS, you know (that's not sarcasm).
--
Jay
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
*******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses.
www.hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated
