If you are using CentOS 3.5 then you want the el3 version of GFS from here:
http://mirror.centos.org/centos-3/3/csgfs/
This is only GFS 6.0 but it works well. It looks like there are lots of
differences in 6.1 so I don't think it will work out of the box on CentOS-3.
I use GFS with GNBD and it works OK. Some of the nodes are 2 hops away
over the ethernet and they can sometimes be a bit slow. They also lock
up if the network goes down (no hardware fencing).
The servers are in the same rack and work well together.
I don't know the maximum filesystem size, or if your hardware is
supported but read the docs and it won't cost you anything to try it.
John.
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> I am considering building a pair of storage servers that will be using
> CentOS and GFS to share the storage from a Coraid (SATA+Raid) EtherDrive
> shelf. Has anyone else tried such a setup?
>
> Is GFS stable enough to use in a production environment?
>
> There is a build of GFS 6.1 at http://rpm.karan.org/el4/csgfs/. Has anyone
> used this? Is it stable?
>
> Will I run into any problems if I use CentOS 3.5 with it's GFS package to
> access a shared 5TB filesystem?
>
> I've been googling on this stuff off and on for a month now. I've found a
> bunch of conflicting and confusing information, but no clear answers. I've
> been kind of hoping that the new GFS 6.1 packages would be released while I
> was waiting... :)
>
> I appreciate any suggestions or pointers.
>
> Bowie
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
>
--
John Newbigin
Computer Systems Officer
Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies
Swinburne University of Technology
Melbourne, Australia
http://www.ict.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin
