On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 13:43 -0400, Chris Mauritz wrote:
> Anyone seen either of these "in the wild" yet? RHEL3/RHEL4 are install
> options so I'm assuming CentOS will just work out of the box, but I
> thought I'd ask here. The 2100 seems like a viable alternative to
> whitebox 1RU boxes that we currently use, especially with the new dual
> core processors.
The price point on these seem quite good, and I like their ads:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/09/13/2213243&threshold=-1&tid=102&tid=133
(Actually, the ads are kind of cheesy)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050914/8f73d429/attachment.bin
