Re: more recent perl version?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Warren Young wrote:
On May 24, 2017, at 9:38 AM, hw <hw@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Warren Young schrieb:
On May 24, 2017, at 7:05 AM, hw <hw@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
apache uses mod_perl

mod_perl was dropped from Apache in 2.4, and Red Hat followed suit with RHEL 7.

What is it using instead?

There are various options.  We use mod_fcgid + Plack here.

I need to look into that when I have time.  Test have shown that
lighttpd apparently is somewhat faster than apache2, and I´m
planning to use it instead of apache for what apache is doing atm.

And atop that, Dancer, if you care.  http://perldancer.org/  Join me on the Dancer ML if you want to talk further about it.

I hope this does not strike you as inconsistent with respect to my prior posts, since that would be to construct a false equivalence between abandoned software and maintained stable software that is getting no new features.

Not at all --- the point is that software usually becomes abandoned
once a more recent version becomes available.

And that’s what we keep trying to tell you: in the RHEL/CentOS world, that simply is not the case, because there is a multibillion-dollar entity ensuring that it is not so.

That´s a good thing, though it can be difficult to run systems
using ancient software.

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux