Why is yum not liked by some?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Feizhou <feizhou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So discussions about how to manage a farm of centos boxes
> should be done elsewhere?

I am just sick of being the "coincidental person" who is
quoted.  People can argue it is volume -- but I _ignore_ the
thread for 3 days, and then make 3 posts, and I'm quoted
right afterwards!

Sometimes I think it's the technical detail that I put in my
post that pisses people off more than the volume.  This was a
perfect example.  I do my _damnest_ to try to detail _real_
technical _solutions_ and not a "wish list rant" for 5+ days.

If other people are ranting about what they want, and I come
in and list specific, detailed technical information,
possible solutions, how they will and won't work, why oh why
am I held up as an example?  I'm sorry, the "it's because you
think you're smarter than anyone else" argument does _not_
hold.

I have tried to provide possible solutions to people, not to
sport my "knowledge," but to try to get them to be more
productive.  I'm sorry I even re-entered the thread.  But it
was just as "noisy" for 3 days when I let it be.


-- 
Bryan J. Smith                | Sent from Yahoo Mail
mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx     |  (please excuse any
http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ |   missing headers)

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux