Re: bind vs. bind-chroot

[Nicolas Kovacs <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Le 13/04/2017 à 00:18, John R Pierce a écrit :
> 
> bind went through a rocky stage where there were a LOT of security holes
> in it.  by running it in a chroot, you limit its ability to be used as a
> hacking point of entry.    recent versions of bind (basicially, 9 and
> newer) are much more secure, so this is less of a concern.

OK. Thanks for the clarification.

Niki

-- 
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Web  : http://www.microlinux.fr
Mail : info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos