On 4/10/2017 2:27 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Without intent to contradict... I really would prefer them numbered according to their bus address. Not in the order (or reverse order - as it was once) of them been discovered. And if you add hardware with bus address between those of eth0 and eth1, you will have newly added one become eth1, and former eth1 becomes eth2. I know, it stems from old idiotic habit to always look inside the boxes... call me an old UNIX outcast. (No, don't, that would be a complement I unlikely deserve
bus address is a somewhat nebulous concept on PCI, afaik, its not neccessarily slot specific. its even messier on things like USB
-- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
