Once upon a time, Pete Orrall <pete@xxxxxxxx> said:
> > So, at which stage are you in w/ regards to adopting systemd? Are you still
> > ridiculing it, violently opposed to it, or have you mellowed to it?
>
> I've never had to write my own init scripts before so I'm not feeling
> the pain of others, but having professionally managed machines running
> SystemD for a while now honestly I don't mind it. While the language
> used (units, targets) is confusing and documentation could be better,
> there are some things I like about it more than SysVInit.
Yeah, the old init script setup was sorely lacking in some areas
(especially dependencies). While there were well-written init scripts
that were easy to understand, had plenty of configuration options, etc.,
there were many that were largely unreadable.
I like to distinguish systemd-the-pid-1 from systemd-the-project; I
generally like systemd-the-pid-1 (it isn't perfect by any means, but I
think it is an improvement). On the other hand, I dislike the scope
creep and "replace all the wheels" approach of systemd-the-project.
--
Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
