On 9/12/05, Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Any reason you want to install CentOS when you have a running RHL9 > system? > > BTW, although I've had no major issues updating RHL to FC releases, as > FC is the logical upgrade path, RHEL/CentOS is not designed to be an > upgrade option for RHL. > No upgrade path is really all that supported or fool-proof. Since he hasn't upgraded his system from RH9 I would say that CentOS is more likely to suit him than FCx since CentOS will be supported with more certainty for a longer period of time. Regards, Greg