Would this be considered a packaging bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=861692

The source RPM there uses

%if 0%{?rhel}
# not upstreamed
Patch500: 0001-disable-libe-book-support.patch
Patch501: 0001-fix-build-of-bundled-libzmf-with-boost-1.56.patch
Patch502: 0001-allow-to-build-bundled-libzmf-on-aarch64.patch
Patch503: 0001-impl.-missing-function.patch
%endif

(and more than just those) resulting in those patches not being included in the src.rpm because the rpm was not built on rhel/centos.

My understanding was that platform specific patches were suppose to have the %if macro where the patch is applied, but should not be where the source for the patch is defined.

Been a long time since I was a fedora packager so I don't know what current packaging guidelines are, but that just seems wrong.

Is it wrong?
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux