Re: Checksums for git repo content?

[James Hogarth <james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 23 February 2017 at 19:55, Lamar Owen <lowen@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02/09/2017 03:12 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>> The patch files are in git as text files, right?  Why would you need
>> checksums of those? That is the purpose of git, right?
>>
> Not to stir up a hornets' nest, but how does Google's announcement at
> https://shattered.it affect this now?  (Executive summary: Google has
> successfully produced two different PDF files that hash to the same SHA-1.)
> There is a whole paragraph on 'How is GIT affected?'
>
>
>


To stave off another ridiculous thread - short version is simply "it isn't"
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos