mkfs.ext3 on a 9TB volume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 14:02 -0700, Francois Caen wrote:
> My concern with xfs, reiser or jfs is not really how good they are,
> but how well they are implemented/supported in CentOS.

Ditto.  Unfortunately, I don't like the answer.

> And it's hard to choose between the better-but-less-supported
> xfs/reiser/... or the well-supported but not that multi-TB-friendly
> ext3...

For me, it's Ext3-only on RHEL/CentOS 3/4, as well as Fedora Core 3,
with limited XFS testing on the latter.


-- 
Bryan J. Smith     b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx     http://thebs413.blogspot.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The best things in life are NOT free - which is why life is easiest if
you save all the bills until you can share them with the perfect woman


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux