On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Frank Cox <theatre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > That sounds like a weak signal from your wifi transmitter. > Or signal interference. Where is the antennae located on the server? Ran into signal issues with antennae which were tucked behind the server before. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Reliable way of having both LAN and WIFI on headless box
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Reliable way of having both LAN and WIFI on headless box
- From: fred roller <fredroller66@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 22:11:45 -0500
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20170109110459.e43c2fccfb4df687c3a7ddba@melvilletheatre.com>
- References: <201701091605.16482.gary@ringways.co.uk> <20170109110459.e43c2fccfb4df687c3a7ddba@melvilletheatre.com>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Reliable way of having both LAN and WIFI on headless box
- From: John R Pierce
- Re: Reliable way of having both LAN and WIFI on headless box
- References:
- Reliable way of having both LAN and WIFI on headless box
- From: Gary Stainburn
- Re: Reliable way of having both LAN and WIFI on headless box
- From: Frank Cox
- Reliable way of having both LAN and WIFI on headless box
- Prev by Date: Re: How to downgrade gtk2 libs in CentOS 6.8?
- Next by Date: Re: Reliable way of having both LAN and WIFI on headless box
- Previous by thread: Re: Reliable way of having both LAN and WIFI on headless box
- Next by thread: Re: Reliable way of having both LAN and WIFI on headless box
- Index(es):
 |