LVM appears to be very expensive on CentOS 7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



After running a long series of benchmarks, it looks like there is a very significant performance difference between systems using LVM and systems not using LVM under CentOS 7. I'd appreciate it if anyone else can confirm these results.

There are a couple of other surprising aspects of the results, especially that the default storage configuration (LVM and 512k blocks) appears to be the worst configuration possible, when using RAID5 (and probably RAID6).

https://plus.google.com/+GordonMessmer/posts/H5DuyP1LHPU?sfc=true


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux