Re: spec file frustration (rant)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 12/14/2016 03:32 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Phil,
> 
> On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 20:57 +0000, Phil Wyett wrote:
>> The path to the repo is wrong.
>>
>> git clone https://git.centos.org/git/centos-git-common.git
> 
> Too late to boost my brain with more coffee for today. Not as sharp as I
> would like to be ;) .
> 
> Still leaves me with the question why a script to download the source
> tarballs is needed when just not adding a .gitignore entry for them to
> the repos would fix the issue. Could someone involved care to explain
> the rationale behind this or point me to a thread where this has been
> discussed/explained?
> 

Not sure what you are asking.

You don't want to put large GZ tarballs in git .. we only put text file
in git.  All binary files are put in a look-aside cache.

So, when you do git clone you get all the text sources .. when you do
get_sources.sh (or into_srpm.sh) you get all the binary sources
(tarballs, etc.).  You need both to be able to build the SRPM.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux