Re: Dnsmasq and /etc/hosts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Le 24/11/2016 à 10:22, Yamaban a écrit :
> Hmmm, looks like the "lookup question" from amandine(server) is not
> resolved in the same way it is resoved from bernadette or raymonde
> (clients).

After some more fiddling, I guess I found a solution to my problem. If
we formulate the problem differently, we can say that the clients use
the information provided by Dnsmasq, but the server does not. So in
order to make the server use that information, here's how I changed the
configuration.

First, point /etc/resolv.conf to the server itself:

  # /etc/resolv.conf
  nameserver 127.0.0.1

Next, get rid of the 'no-resolv' option in '/etc/dnsmasq.conf':

# /etc/dnsmasq.conf
domain-needed
bogus-priv
interface=enp3s1
dhcp-range=192.168.3.100,192.168.3.200,24h
local=/sandbox.lan/
domain=sandbox.lan
expand-hosts
# DNS
server=192.168.2.1
# Postes fixes
dhcp-host=00:1E:C9:43:A7:BF,bernadette,192.168.3.2
dhcp-host=00:1D:09:15:4A:D8,raymonde,192.168.3.3

After restarting Dnsmasq, everything seems fine now:

  [root@amandine:~] # host bernadette
  bernadette has address 192.168.3.2
  [root@amandine:~] # host raymonde
  raymonde has address 192.168.3.3


Cheers,

Niki

-- 
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Web  : http://www.microlinux.fr
Mail : info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux