On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
> >
> > 1. Is CentOS-7.3 done yet? Answer: NO!
> >
> > And it is NOT CentOS-7.3 .. it is CentOS-7 (1611) based on RHEL-7.3
> > Sources. The main tree will be labeled '7.3.1611' on the mirrors (along
> > side 7.0.1406 and 7.1.1503, and 7.2.1511, all of which are already there)
> >
> >
> Obligatory objection to this version numbering scheme:
>
> Deviating from RHEL in such a basic way is crazy, dumb, stupid, annoying,
> wrong, etc, etc.
>
> There, done.
>
>
Please, before a new flame, please read all what related with release
numbering discussed on June 2014 thread of centos-devel mailing list:
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2014-June/thread.html
with subject
CentOS 7 and release numbering
started here by Karanbir:
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2014-June/010444.html
Thanks,
Gianluca
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
