Re: Ordering rich rules with firewalld

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



How about 
http://www.firewalld.org/documentation ;  -> firewall.direct(5)
https://twoerner.fedorapeople.org/firewalld/doc/firewalld.direct.html

priority="priority"
The priority is used to order rules. Priority 0 means add rule on top of the chain, with a higher priority the rule will be added further down. Rules with the same priority are on the same level and the order of these rules is not fixed and may change. If you want to make sure that a rule will be added after another one, use a low priority for the first and a higher for the following.

Sounds like the way to force the order.

Dan White | d_e_white@xxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------
“Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.”  (Bill Waterson: Calvin & Hobbes)

On Aug 26, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Jeff White <jeff.white@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Is there any way to order rich rules in firewalld? If I remove all rules and add them back in firewalld seems to put them in whatever order it feels like.

Alternatively, how can I change the default policy of a firewalld zone? At the moment I don't see any way to have a zone accept traffic by default other than adding a rich rule allowing 0.0.0.0/0.

--
Jeff White
HPC Systems Engineer
Information Technology Services - WSU

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux