Re: local routing puzzle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



I forgot to mentioned, just to be clear, these IFs are all one node, the same one hos, its routing table:

10.5.6.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 350 0 0 nm-team1 172.25.12.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 100 0 0 p3p3 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 110 0 0 em2 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 111 0 0 em1

no default gateways, so you can see these are directly connected networks

$ traceroute -n 10.5.6.17 -i em1
traceroute to 10.5.6.17 (10.5.6.17), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.5.6.17  0.426 ms !X  0.393 ms !X  0.311 ms !X
$ traceroute -n 10.5.6.17 -i em2
traceroute to 10.5.6.17 (10.5.6.17), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.5.6.17  0.382 ms !X  0.326 ms !X  0.274 ms !X
$ traceroute -n 10.5.6.17 -i nm-team1
traceroute to 10.5.6.17 (10.5.6.17), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  10.5.6.17  0.407 ms !X  0.342 ms !X  0.294 ms !X
$ traceroute -n 10.5.6.17 -i p3p3
traceroute to 10.5.6.17 (10.5.6.17), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  * * *
 2  * * *
 3  * * *
 4  * * *

I was expecting kernel's network would know best, what to do, especially that: (enp6s0f0 is 10.5.6.17)

root@10.5.6.17 ]$ ping 172.25.12.222 -I enp6s0f0
PING 172.25.12.202 (172.25.12.222) from 10.5.6.17 enp6s0f0: 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 172.25.12.222: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.396 ms

there are two switches and vlans, switches routes auto configured, no default gateways on the switches neither, to try to simplify & troubleshoot.

regards
L.

On 16/08/16 11:59, John R Pierce wrote:
On 8/16/2016 3:53 AM, lejeczek wrote:

$ ping 10.5.6.17 -I p3p3
PING 10.5.6.17 (10.5.6.17) from 172.25.12.202 p3p3: 56(84) bytes of data.

and nothing, ping waits and no reply, Ctrl+C

with such a simple setup rules based routing should not be involved, kernel should figure it out, right?

you specifically said to send that packet to an interface on the wrong network, of course, its not going to get through, unless there's an external route from that network to the destination. I'm presuming there's a router somewhere else between your 192.168.2.0/24 network and 10.5.6.17, that would enable those ping -I em1/2 commands to work. note that the recipient of the ping needs to have a route to get back to the source, too.





_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux