On 22/06/16 02:31 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 6/22/2016 11:06 AM, Digimer wrote:
>> I know this goes against the
>> grain of sysadmins to yank power, but in an HA setup, nodes should be
>> disposable and replaceable. The nodes are not important, the hosted
>> services are.
>
> of course, the really tricky problem is implementing an ISCSI storage
> infrastructure thats fully redundant and has no single point of
> failure. this requires the redundant storage controllers to have
> shared write-back cache, fully redundant networking, etc. The
> fiberchannel SAN folks had all this down pat 20 years ago, but at an
> astronomical price point.
>
> The more complex this stuff gets, the more points of potential failure
> you introduce.
Or use DRBD. That's what we do for our shared storage backing our VMs
and shared FS. Works like a charm.
--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without
access to education?
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
