Re: https and self signed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 15.06.2016 16:17, Warren Young wrote:
On Jun 15, 2016, at 7:57 AM, Александр Кириллов<nevis2us@xxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
Nowadays it's quite easy to get normal ssl certificates for free. E.g.

http://www.startssl.com
http://buy.wosign.com/free
Today, I would prefer Let’s Encrypt:

   https://letsencrypt.org/

It is philosophically aligned with the open source software world, rather than act as bait for a company that would prefer to sell you a cert instead.

I’m only aware of one case where you absolutely cannot use Let’s Encrypt,
there is more than one case; just think of trust;

lets encrypt only trusts for 3 months; would you really except in an onlineshop, someone trusts this shop? let us think something like this: "when the CA only trusts for 3 months, how should I trust for a longer period
which is important for warranty ..."

  but it also affects the other public CAs: you can’t get a publicly-trusted cert for a machine without a publicly-recognized and -visible domain name.  For that, you still need to use self-signed certs or certs signed by a private CA.
A private CA is the same as self signed;


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux