Re: Internal RAID controllers question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 05/09/2016 11:46 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Yes, ZFS, and thanks a lot! For distributed file system "brick" boxes ZFS
(btrfs,...) may be a must, but only if distributed filesystem doesn't have
its own mechanism ensuring file integrity, right?


Ignore distributed filesystems for a moment. Is there any application for which want to allow your computer to silently corrupt your data? My email archive consists of messages in individual files (Maildir), and I'd like to ensure that bits don't flip. I'd like to ensure that bits don't flip in my music files, creating noise during playback (one corrupt sample could end up being pure noise played back at maximum volume).

Even for very basic, relatively unimportant purposes, I want my data in a reliable filesystem.

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux