Re: About mysql upgrade

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 04/28/2016 08:45 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
I've found some issues upgrading mysql, some people recommends run
mysql_upgrade. I wonder why such a script is not run from scriptlet of
mysql-server rpm.
Back in the Dark Ages of the PostgreSQL RPMset (PostgreSQL 6.5), early in my time as RPM maintainer for the community PostgreSQL.org RPMset, I asked a very similar question of some folks, and I got a canonical answer from Mr. RPM himself, Jeff Johnson.

The answer is not very complex, but it was spread across a several message private e-mail thread. The gist of it is that the RPM scriptlets are very very limited in what they can do. Trying to do something clever inside an RPM scriptlet is almost never wise. The key thing to remember is that the scriptlet has to be able to be run during the OS install phase (back when upgrades were actually supported by the OS installer that is now known as anaconda). Quoting this introductory section:

On August 18, 1999, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> The Red Hat install environment is a chroot. That means no daemons,
> no network, no devices, nothing. Even sniffing /proc can be problematic
> in certain cases.

Now, I realize that that is OLD information; however, anaconda is still doing the same basic chrooted install, just with a prettier face. You cannot start a daemon in the chroot, since many things are simply not available to the scriptlets when installed/upgraded by anaconda. Scriptlets have to work in an environment other than 'yum update.' And also note that this is a very different situation than Debian packages live in; RPM scriptlets are essentially forbidden from interactivity with the user; Debian's equivalent are not so hindered. At least that was the rule as long as I was an active packager.

Further reference a WayBack Machine archive of a page I wrote long ago:
https://web.archive.org/web/20010122090200/http://www.ramifordistat.net/postgres/rpm_upgrade.html

And leaving you with this thought, again from Jeff Johnson:

On August 18, 1999, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> Good. Now you're starting to think like a packager  Avoiding MUD is
> *much* more important than attempting magic.
....

> The bottom line is you shouldn't attempt a database conversion as
> part of the package install. The package, however, should contain programs
> and procedures necessary to do the job.





_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux