Re: Bourne shell deprecated?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 04/26/16 21:13, John R Pierce wrote:
On 4/26/2016 6:45 PM, Jack Bailey wrote:

Today someone in a meeting claimed the Bourne shell is deprecated, one of the reasons being it supposedly has security issues. Well that's all news to me, and I cannot find anything online to corroborate the claim. Is this true, is it a bash vs. Bourne FUD, or something else?

there's no Bourne shell in CentOS anyways, /bin/sh is a symlink to /bin/bash...

last OS I can think of with an actual Bourne shell was Solaris.



The various *BSD's have & use the actual Bourne shell ....


--

	William A. Mahaffey III

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

	"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
	 ever devised by man."
                           -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux